|
Join freedominfo.org's email update list |
home > ifti watch |
24 SEPTEMBER 2008 An international effort to encourage transparency about development aid was launched in Accra, Ghana, on Sept. 4. The announcement of the International Aid Transparency Initiative (IATI) came on the fringes of a major international conference on aid effectiveness. The resulting "Accra Agenda" supports more transparency, but was short on specifics in the eyes of some activists. The more concrete development was the IATI, which is to be a database that will increase the availability of information about aid flows. This is intended to allow increased scrutiny of aid and help recipients and donors coordinate and plan more effectively. Unveiled at the "High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness" in Accra, the IATI was pushed by the Netherlands and the United Kingdom, with support from the World Bank, the United Nations Development Programme, the European Commission and the Hewlett Foundation. A press release from the UK indicates that donors should agree to provide "full and detailed information on all aid in each country affected, details and costs of individual projects and their aims, and reliable infornation on future aid." Britain's international development secretary, Douglas Alexander said: "We see this as an important first step to increase certainty for both donors and the countries receiving aid. The impact of aid in relieving poverty can be greatly increased if everyone can see where the money's coming from, who is spending it and what it should be achieving." He said that only half of the financial assistance provided shows up in the budgets of developing nations, and called the new intitiave a tool against the misuse of aid. Data on the scope of aid was included in a speech by World Bank President Robert Zoellick:
Zoellick said that "the possibilities to expand transparency and boost effective development are just starting to be tapped." According to the president, "Whether it's a question of posting budgets for schools on the door, or whether it's a question of working with extractive industries, the potential gains are very great." He continued: "One important idea is for donors and recipients to report their funding in ways that eases tracking and accountability. In this context, I think the UK's International Aid Trade Transparency Initiative is highly timely and very useful." He also supported channeling more aid through national budgets. Accra Agenda Transparency Langauge Called Unspecific The IATA announcement came as 1,200 delegates from 120 countries met Sept. 2-4 to complete the "Accra Agenda for Action on Aid Effectiveness." Many civil society organisations dubbed the communiqué an "agenda for inaction." Among other things, the groups wanted stronger language on transparency and more comprehensive disclosure of information. Without specifying how it will be achieved, donor governments committed to publish "regular, detailed, and timely" information on aid spending. They also committed to open procurement of services, as well as to providing "full and timely information" on current and planned aid spending, up to five years in advance. The specific language says: "We will make aid more transparent. Developing countries will facilitate parliamentary oversight by implementing greater transparency in public financial management, including public disclosure of revenues, budgets, expenditures, procurement and audits. Donors will publicly disclose regular, detailed and timely information on volume, allocation and, when available, results of development expenditure to enable more accurate budget, accounting and audit by developing countries." Transparency International (TI) voiced its disappointment Sept. 5, indicating in a press release that "the meeting concluded with few firm, time-bound commitments on fighting corruption, jeopardizing the global campaign to end poverty." TI wrote: "Despite stated support by many attendees for aid transparency and accountability, the Forum’s communiqué, the Accra Action Agenda, ultimately fell short on specific timelines and concrete commitments to increase accountability and transparency in the development process. The lack of progress threatens to undermine aid as an effective tool for supplying medicines to clinics, building schools and attacking the roots of extreme poverty, which plagues more than 1.4 billion people around the world." The campaign asked donor governments to fulfill their transparency commitments without delay. "The commitments in the Accra Agenda for Action reflect growing recognition that greater transparency is central to aid delivering on its promise – to empower people in the fight against poverty," said Martin Tisné, Programme Director at Tiri (London), one of the founders of the Publish What You Fund Campaign. "Lack of transparency is detrimental to democratic engagement and accountability and risks undercutting aid effectiveness." The four principles of Publish What You Fund are:
By Toby McIntosh
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Suite
701, Gelman Library, 2130 H Street, NW, Washington, D.C., 20037 - email@freedominfo.org Copyright © 2006-2008 freedominfo.org |